Lesson 1.5 · Unit 1 · CA HSS 11.1.4
What the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments actually say
Three amendments passed between 1865 and 1870 rewrote the relationship between the citizen, the state and the federal government more thoroughly than anything since 1787. Reading their exact words is worth an entire lesson, because almost every later civil rights case turns on them.
- The Thirteenth, 1865, abolished slavery and involuntary servitude throughout the United States, except as punishment for a crime.
- The exception clause mattered. Convict leasing systems in the South used criminal conviction to compel labor, which the amendment's own text permitted.
- The Fourteenth, 1868, established birthright citizenship and forbade states from abridging privileges or immunities, denying due process, or denying equal protection of the laws.
- The Fourteenth changed the direction of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights had limited the federal government; the Fourteenth limits the states, and through it most of the Bill of Rights was eventually applied against them.
- The Fifteenth, 1870, forbade denial of the vote on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude.
- What the Fifteenth did not say is the key to the next ninety years: it forbids racial denial and says nothing about literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses or white primaries.
- Each amendment carries an enforcement clause giving Congress power to enforce it by appropriate legislation, which is the constitutional basis of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Where students lose marks: paraphrasing loosely. These are short texts and the exact wording decides cases. Quote the operative phrase and explain what it does and does not cover.
The source. Amendments XIII, XIV and XV to the Constitution of the United States, 1865, 1868 and 1870. Public domain, constitutional text.
Amendment XIII, Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Amendment XIV, Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Amendment XV, Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Step one: notice the first clause of the Fourteenth and what it overturns. All persons born in the United States are citizens. That sentence directly reverses Dred Scott, which had held that Black Americans could not be citizens, and it settles the question by constitutional text rather than by judicial opinion.
Step two: count the prohibitions in the Fourteenth. Three: privileges or immunities, due process, and equal protection. Each was written to do work, and the Supreme Court promptly narrowed the first almost to nothing in the Slaughterhouse Cases of 1873, which is why later litigation runs through due process and equal protection instead.
Step three: note the shift in whom the Constitution restrains. The Bill of Rights says Congress shall make no law. The Fourteenth says no State shall. That reverses the direction of constitutional protection and is why, over the following century, most of the Bill of Rights came to bind state governments as well.
Step four: read the word "person" against the word "citizen". The Fourteenth grants citizenship to those born here, and then extends due process and equal protection to any person within a state's jurisdiction. Non-citizens are covered by the second set of protections, and that drafting choice has decided a great deal of later law.
Step five: identify the gap in the Fifteenth, which is the whole lesson. It forbids denial on account of race. It does not require that anyone be allowed to vote. A state may therefore impose any qualification it likes, provided the qualification is not expressed in racial terms.
Step six: apply that gap to what southern states actually did. Literacy tests administered by white registrars who decided who passed. Poll taxes payable long before election day. Grandfather clauses exempting anyone whose grandfather could vote in 1867. White primaries run by parties claiming to be private associations. None of these mentions race, and together they reduced Black registration in some states to a few percent by 1910.
Step seven: explain why the enforcement clauses matter more than they look. Each amendment ends by giving Congress power to enforce it by appropriate legislation. That clause is the constitutional authority for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Voting Rights Act works by reaching the devices in step six rather than by restating the Fifteenth's prohibition.
Step eight: state the general lesson about rights. A right stated in general terms can be defeated by a rule that does not mention it. Closing that gap took ninety-five years, an enforcement statute with administrative machinery, and federal officials on the ground, which is the argument of unit 10.
Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.
- What does the Thirteenth Amendment do, and what is its exception?
Show the full solution
Abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime on due conviction
- Name the three prohibitions in Section 1 of the Fourteenth.
Show the full solution
Abridging privileges or immunities, denying due process, and denying equal protection
- What does the Fifteenth Amendment forbid?
Show the full solution
Denying or abridging the vote on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude
- Which decision does the Fourteenth's first sentence overturn?
Show the full solution
Dred Scott, which held that Black Americans could not be citizens
- What does each amendment's final section give Congress?
Show the full solution
Power to enforce the amendment by appropriate legislation
- How was the Thirteenth Amendment's exception clause used?
Show the full solution
Southern states passed vagrancy and similar laws under which Black men could be convicted on slight evidence, then leased the convicted to private employers for labor. Because the amendment permits involuntary servitude as punishment for crime on due conviction, convict leasing operated within the text rather than against it. The lesson is that an exception written into a right defines the route around it, which is why the exact wording of these amendments is worth a full lesson. Convict leasing used criminal conviction to compel labor within the text's own exception
- Why did the Fourteenth reverse the direction of constitutional protection?
Show the full solution
Because the Bill of Rights restrains the federal government, saying Congress shall make no law, and leaves states free. The Fourteenth says no State shall, which for the first time makes state governments answerable under the federal Constitution for how they treat people within their borders. That reversal is the basis on which, over the following century, most of the Bill of Rights came to bind states as well, and it is the structural change Reconstruction made permanent. The Bill of Rights restrains Congress; the Fourteenth restrains the states
- Explain the difference the Fourteenth draws between "citizen" and "person".
Show the full solution
Citizenship is granted to those born or naturalized here, and the privileges or immunities clause protects citizens. But due process and equal protection are extended to any person within a state's jurisdiction, which includes non-citizens. That drafting choice was deliberate and has decided a great deal of later law, since it means a state's obligations of fair procedure and equal treatment do not depend on the immigration status of the person in front of it. Some protections attach to citizenship; due process and equal protection attach to presence
- How was the Fifteenth Amendment defeated without being violated?
Show the full solution
By using qualifications that never mention race. Literacy tests were administered by white registrars who decided who passed and could fail a college graduate. Poll taxes were payable months before an election and often cumulative. Grandfather clauses exempted anyone whose grandfather could vote in 1867, which no Black voter's could. White primaries excluded Black voters from the only contest that mattered by calling the party a private association. Black registration fell to a few percent. Literacy tests, poll taxes, grandfather clauses and white primaries never say race
- What general lesson about rights does this history teach?
Show the full solution
That a right stated in general terms can be defeated entirely by rules that never mention it, so a prohibition is only as strong as the machinery available to detect and stop evasion. Closing the gap between the Fifteenth Amendment and an actual vote took ninety-five years, a statute built on the enforcement clause, federal examiners sent to register voters, and a requirement that covered states get approval before changing election rules. Stating a right is the beginning of the work. A general right needs enforcement machinery, or neutral-sounding rules will defeat it