Lesson 1.4 · Unit 1 · CA HSS 12.1.4
A realistic view of human nature, and the system it produced
The framers did not expect officeholders to be good, and they did not expect voters to be wise. The standard asks how that view led directly to a constitutional system limiting the power of both the governors and the governed, and the answer is in the Federalist.
- The framers' premise is that people pursue their own interest and that power is abused whenever it can be, so institutions must not depend on the virtue of the people holding office.
- Limiting the governors is done by enumerating powers, separating them, and giving each branch the means to resist the others.
- Limiting the governed is done by representation rather than direct rule, by staggered terms and indirect selection, and by rights that majorities cannot override.
- The Federalist Papers are eighty-five essays written in 1787 and 1788 by Hamilton, Madison and Jay to argue for ratification, and they are the fullest explanation of the design by the people who made it.
- The key move is to use ambition against ambition, arranging offices so that each officeholder's personal interest is tied to defending the powers of their own branch.
- The design is a substitute for virtue, not a denial that virtue exists; Madison says that if men were angels no government would be necessary.
- The criticism this invites is that a system designed to block action may block necessary action as well as dangerous action, which is the recurring complaint about American government.
Where students lose marks: describing the checks without explaining what makes officials use them. The answer is self-interest: a senator defends the Senate's powers because those powers are the senator's own.
The source. James Madison, Federalist No. 51, 1788. Public domain.
But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others. Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place.
It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary.
In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
Step one: identify the two requirements in the last passage. The government must be able to control the governed, which requires real power, and it must be obliged to control itself, which requires real limits. Madison states these as a difficulty because they pull in opposite directions.
Step two: notice what Madison rejects. He does not propose to solve the problem by electing good people. The phrase about angels is an argument that no design may assume good character, because if character could be relied on the whole apparatus would be unnecessary.
Step three: state the mechanism precisely. Constitutional means plus personal motives. Means alone is insufficient, since a power nobody wants to use is not a check. Motive alone is insufficient, since a determination to resist without authority achieves nothing. Both are required, and Madison names both.
Step four: work the mechanism on a concrete power. The Senate confirms appointments. The means is the constitutional requirement of advice and consent. The motive is that a senator who lets the President appoint whoever he likes has reduced the Senate's standing, and therefore the senator's own. Self-interest and institutional interest are deliberately aligned.
Step five: identify where the mechanism can fail. It assumes an officeholder identifies primarily with the branch. If a senator identifies more strongly with a political party, and the President shares that party, the personal motive may run the other way: defending the President rather than the Senate. Parties are not in the Constitution and were not anticipated, and this is the largest gap in Madison's design.
Step six: apply the limits on the governed. The House is elected directly for two years; the Senate was originally chosen by state legislatures for six; the President is chosen by electors; judges serve for life. Each layer puts distance between a popular majority and the exercise of power, deliberately slowing what a majority can do.
Step seven: state the purpose of that slowing. Not to frustrate the people but to ensure that what passes is a settled judgment rather than a momentary passion. A measure that survives a two-year House, a six-year Senate, a presidential veto and judicial review has been wanted for a long time by a lot of people.
Step eight: state the strongest objection. The same design that blocks dangerous action blocks necessary action. A system requiring agreement among many independently selected actors produces deadlock when they disagree, and urgent problems can go unaddressed for decades. That is not a malfunction; it is the cost of the design, and whether the cost is worth paying is a real argument rather than a misunderstanding.
Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.
- What are the Federalist Papers?
Show the full solution
Eighty-five essays by Hamilton, Madison and Jay in 1787 and 1788 arguing for ratification of the Constitution
- State the framers' premise about human nature.
Show the full solution
That people pursue their own interest and power is abused whenever it can be
- Name two ways the Constitution limits the governors.
Show the full solution
Enumerating powers, separating them, and giving each branch means to resist the others
- Name two ways it limits the governed.
Show the full solution
Representation rather than direct rule, staggered terms and indirect selection, and rights majorities cannot override
- What does Madison mean by ambition counteracting ambition?
Show the full solution
Arranging offices so each officeholder's personal interest is tied to defending their own branch's powers
- What are the two requirements Madison identifies, and why are they difficult together?
Show the full solution
Government must be enabled to control the governed, which requires it to hold real power, and it must be obliged to control itself, which requires real limits on that power. The difficulty is that the two pull in opposite directions: every limit designed to restrain the government also reduces its capacity to govern, and every power granted to make it effective also makes it more dangerous. Madison presents this as a difficulty rather than a solved problem. It must be powerful enough to govern and limited enough not to threaten, which conflict
- Why does Madison rule out relying on good officeholders?
Show the full solution
Because a design that works only when good people hold office is not a design at all, and the whole point of government is that people cannot be relied on. His remark that if men were angels no government would be necessary is precisely this argument: the existence of government is already an admission that character cannot be assumed, so it would be incoherent to build the government on that assumption. Structure must do the work. A government exists because character cannot be relied on, so it cannot rely on character
- Explain why both means and motive are necessary, using confirmation of appointments.
Show the full solution
The Senate's means is the constitutional requirement of advice and consent, without which no amount of determination to check the President achieves anything. The motive is that a senator who approves whatever the President sends has diminished the Senate's standing and therefore the senator's own. Means without motive gives a power nobody bothers to use; motive without means gives frustration. Madison deliberately names both because either alone fails. Consent is the means and the senator's own standing is the motive; neither works alone
- Identify the largest gap in Madison's design.
Show the full solution
Political parties. The mechanism assumes an officeholder identifies primarily with their branch, so that a senator defends the Senate. If a senator identifies more strongly with a party, and the President shares it, the personal motive runs the other way and the senator defends the President against the Senate's own institutional interest. Parties appear nowhere in the Constitution and were not anticipated, so the check they weaken was never designed to survive them. Party loyalty can override branch loyalty, which the design assumed
- State the strongest objection to this design.
Show the full solution
That a system built to block dangerous action necessarily blocks necessary action too. Requiring agreement among a two-year House, a six-year Senate, a President with a veto and courts with review produces deadlock whenever those actors disagree, and urgent problems can therefore go unaddressed for decades. This is not a malfunction but the cost of the design working as intended, and whether the cost is worth paying is a genuine argument rather than a misunderstanding of the system. Blocking bad action also blocks needed action, which is the design's cost not its failure