California's standards define congruence through motion: two figures are congruent when one can
be moved onto the other by translations, reflections and rotations. That definition is what most
questions in this unit are really testing, so the coordinate rules are worth knowing cold.
The method
The three rigid motions: rigid because each preserves distance and angle,
so the image is always congruent to the original.
- Translation \( (x, y) \to (x + a, y + b) \). Slides without turning or
flipping.
- Reflection. Across the \( x \)-axis: \( (x, y) \to (x, -y) \). Across
the \( y \)-axis: \( (x, y) \to (-x, y) \). Across \( y = x \):
\( (x, y) \to (y, x) \). Remember which coordinate changes by asking which axis you are
jumping over, reflecting over the \( x \)-axis changes height, so \( y \) flips.
- Rotation about the origin. 90° counter-clockwise:
\( (x, y) \to (-y, x) \). 180°: \( (x, y) \to (-x, -y) \). 270° counter-clockwise:
\( (x, y) \to (y, -x) \).
- To show two figures are congruent: describe a specific sequence of rigid
motions carrying one exactly onto the other. "They look the same" earns nothing; "reflect
across the \( y \)-axis, then translate 3 down" earns the mark.
- Dilation is not rigid. It changes size, so it produces a similar figure,
not a congruent one.
Where marks are lost: rotation direction. Unless a question
says clockwise, assume counter-clockwise. A 90° clockwise rotation is the same as 270°
counter-clockwise, giving \( (x, y) \to (y, -x) \), check by rotating a single point you can
picture, such as \( (1, 0) \).
Worked examples
Example 1: applying a rule. Translate \( A(2, -3) \) by
\( (x, y) \to (x - 4, y + 5) \).
\( x: 2 - 4 = -2 \); \( y: -3 + 5 = 2 \). So \( A' = (-2, 2) \). The figure moves 4 left and
5 up.
Example 2: describing an unknown transformation. A triangle has vertices
\( (1, 2), (4, 2), (1, 6) \). Its image is \( (-1, 2), (-4, 2), (-1, 6) \). Describe the
transformation.
Each \( x \)-coordinate has changed sign while every \( y \) stayed put. That is exactly
\( (x, y) \to (-x, y) \). A reflection across the \( y \)-axis. Checking
every vertex rather than one is what makes this safe, a single point could match several
different transformations.
Example 3: a sequence proving congruence. Show that triangle
\( (0,0), (3,0), (0,4) \) is congruent to \( (5,1), (5,4), (1,1) \).
The first has legs 3 and 4 along the axes. The second has a vertical leg from
\( (5,1) \) to \( (5,4) \), length 3, and a horizontal leg from \( (5,1) \) to \( (1,1) \),
length 4, the legs have swapped orientation, which suggests a rotation.
Rotate the first 90° counter-clockwise about the origin: \( (x,y) \to (-y,x) \) sends
\( (0,0) \to (0,0) \), \( (3,0) \to (0,3) \), \( (0,4) \to (-4,0) \). Now translate by
\( (+5, +1) \): \( (5,1) \), \( (5,4) \), \( (1,1) \), exactly the target.
Rotate 90° counter-clockwise about the origin, then translate 5 right and 1 up.